oversight

Consultant's Review of the Social Security Administration's Cost Assignment Methodology

Published by the Government Accountability Office on 1997-10-01.

Below is a raw (and likely hideous) rendition of the original report. (PDF)

1
3   A0   United States
         General Accounting Office
         Washington, D.C. 20548

         Accounting and Information
         Management Division

         B-278186

         October 1, 1997


         The Honorable Donna E. Shalala
         The Secretary of Health and Human Services

         The Honorable Kenneth S. Apfel
         Commissioner
         The Social Security Administration

         Subject: Consultant’s Review of the Social Securitv Administration’s Cost
                  Assignment Methodology

         This letter responds to an October 18, 1996, joint request from the Secretary of
         the Department of Health and Human Services and the Commissioner of the
         Social Security Administration (SSA) for GAO’s assistance in carrying out a
         study of the cost assignment methodology SSA uses to charge costs to the
         Medicare Trust Funds. The conference committee report on the Social Security
         Independence and Program Improvements Act of 1994 (Public Law 103-296)
         requires SSA and the Department of Health and Human Service’s Health Care
         Financing Administration (HCFA) to conduct this study. GAO’s assistance was
         requested to help produce an objective and technically sound cost allocation
         approach.

         In March 1997, after a series of discussions with your agencies’staffs, we
         agreed to assist in performing the study by engaging a public accounting firm,
         Price Waterhouse LIP, to review SSA’s cost assignment methodology, on a
         reimbursable basis from your agencies. In connection with the contract, we
         developed the scope of work, selected the contractor, reviewed Price
         Waterhouse’s report and related workpapers, and discussed the work with its
         representatives. We also kept SSA, HCFA, and Office of Management and
         Budget representatives involved throughout the project. Price Waterhouse LLP
         discussed its review results with representatives of your agencies, who have
         agreed with the study’s findings and recommendations.




                                                        GAOIAIMD-9%3RSSA Cost Methodology
Price Waterhouse LLP issued a report dated September 29, 1997, entitled Social
Securitv Administration Cost Assignment Methodologv Review, which has been
provided to you. In summary, Price Waterhouse UP reports that, although
SSA’s cost practices are consistent with a cost assignment methodology
developed in the early 1970s for assigning SSA’s administrative costs for the
programs it supported, including the Medicare programs-which are now
administered by HCFA-and while this methodology may have satisfied costing
needs at the time, changes in federal activities, requirements, technologies, and
assumptions over the last several years indicate that many of SSA’s cost
assignment bases need to be revisited and updated. Consequently, the report
includes a number of recommendations to significantly change SSA’s cost
assignment methodology to more accurately allocate costs among programs.
These recommendations also will provide cost information to support
performance measurement and reporting requirements of the Government
Performance and Results Act and the Chief Financial Officers Act.

Our review, as differentiated from an audit performed in accordance with
generally accepted government auditing standards, was not intended to enable
us to express, and we do not express, an opinion on SSA’s cost accounting
system. Price Waterhouse LLP is responsible for the report and the conclusions
expressed in it. However, the results of our review disclosed no instances
where Price Waterhouse LLP did not comply, in all material respects, with
applicable professional standards.

We believe that the consultant’s conclusions are reasonable and its
recommendations are appropriate. We are available to provide assistance as
SSA undertakes efforts to implement the recommendations.

 Please contact me at (202) 512-3900 if you or your staffs have any questions
 about this letter.




 Chief Accountant




 (9 17605)

 Page 2                                          GAO/AIMD-9&3R SSA Cost Methodology
Ordering    Information

The first copy of each GAO report and testimony is free.
Additional   copies are $2 each. Orders should be sent to the
following address, accompanied by a check or money order
made out to the Superintendent     of Documents, when
necessary. VISA and MasterCard      credit cards are accepted, also.
Orders for 100 or more copies to be mailed to a single address
are discounted 25 percent.

Orders by mail:

U.S. General Accountiug    Office
P.O. Box 37060
Washington,     DC 20013

or visit:

Room 1100
700 4th St. NW (corner of 4th and G Sts. NW)
U.S. General Accounting Office
Washington, DC

Orders may also be placed by calbug (202) 612-6000
or by using fax number (202) 512-6061, or TDD (202)       512-2537.

Each day, GAO issues a list of newly available reports and
testimony.   To receive facsimile copies of the daily list or any
list from the past 30 days, please call (202) 612-6000 using a
touchtone phone. A recorded menu will provide information         on
how to obtain these lists.

For information on how to access GAO reports on the INTERNET,
send an e-mail message with “info” in the body to:

info@www.gao.gov

or visit GAO’s World Wide Web Home Page at:

httpYwww.gao.gov
United States
General Accounting  Office                   BulkRat+
Washington, D.C. 20548-0001            Postage & Fees Paid
                                                GAO
                                     1   PermitNo.    GlOO   1
Official   Business
Penalty    for Private   Use $300

Address    Correction    Requested