oversight

NOAA Fleet: Responses to Post-Hearing Questions

Published by the Government Accountability Office on 1999-03-22.

Below is a raw (and likely hideous) rendition of the original report. (PDF)

      United States

GAO   General Accounting Office
      Washington, D.C. 20548

      General Government Division



      B-282315

      March 22, 1999

      The Honorable Ken Calvert
      Chairman, Subcommittee on Energy and Environment
      Committee on Science
      House of Representatives

      Subject: NOAA Fleet: Responses to Post-Hearing Questions

      On February 24, 1999, we testified before your Subcommittee on two National Oceanic and
      Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) issues—National Weather Service modernization and
                                                     1
      NOAA’s fleet of research and survey ships. Both of these issues also were highlighted in our
                                                                                                  2
      recent performance and accountability series report on the Department of Commerce. In the
      NOAA fleet area, NOAA continues to own, operate, and plan investments of hundreds of
      millions of dollars in its aging fleet of 15 ships that are used to support its programs in
      fisheries research, oceanographic research, and hydrographic charting and mapping. NOAA’s
      fleet is managed and operated by a NOAA Corps of about 240 uniformed commissioned
      officers who, like the Public Health Service Corps, perform civilian rather than military
      functions but are covered by a military-like pay and benefits system. For more than a decade,
      our office and others have urged NOAA to aggressively pursue more cost-effective
      alternatives for acquiring needed marine data. While NOAA has increased its outsourcing for
      these services, it continues to rely heavily on its aging in-house fleet of ships—many of which
      are costly and inefficient to operate and maintain and lack the latest state-of-the-art
      technology—and still plans to replace at least some of these ships.

      Following the February 1999 hearing, you asked us to respond, for the hearing record, to
      several post-hearing questions regarding the NOAA fleet. This letter responds to your
      questions. Our responses are based on our prior work on NOAA fleet and NOAA Corps issues,
      Commerce Inspector General (IG) reports and testimonies on these issues, and our reviews
      of the Department of Commerce’s strategic and performance plans required by the
      Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 (Results Act). Your questions and our
      responses are contained in the enclosure to this letter.




      1
       Department of Commerce: National Weather Service Modernization and NOAA Fleet Issues (GAO/T-AIMD/GGD-99-97, Feb. 24,
      1999).
      2
          Major Management Challenges and Program Risks: Department of Commerce (GAO/OCG-99-3, January 1999).




      Page 1                                                          GAO/GGD-99-60R Responses to NOAA Fleet Questions
B-282315


As agreed with your office, we will make copies of this letter available to others upon request.
If you have any further questions or wish to discuss our responses, please call me at
(202) 512-8676.

Sincerely yours,




L. Nye Stevens
Director, Federal Management
   and Workforce Issues

Enclosure




Page 2                                            GAO/GGD-99-60R Responses to NOAA Fleet Questions
Enclosure

Subcommittee Questions and Our
Responses

1. You included the NOAA fleet in your recent performance and accountability
series report as one of four performance and management challenges facing the
Department of Commerce. Could you briefly tell the Subcommittee why GAO
considers the NOAA fleet issue to be one of Commerce’s major challenges?

Answer: The NOAA fleet was first identified as a policy and management problem more than
a decade ago. At that time, most of NOAA’s fleet of research and survey ships were
approaching or past their 30-year life expectancies. Following reports by our office and
others, the Department of Commerce identified the NOAA fleet as a material weakness in its
Federal Managers’ Financial Integrity Act (FMFIA) report for fiscal year 1990. In 1993, the
National Performance Review (NPR) recommended that NOAA experiment with
public/private competitions to help fulfill its minimum number of days-at-sea requirements.
However, NOAA has experienced significant difficulties in its efforts to plan and implement
solutions, and the NOAA fleet remains one of the Department’s material weaknesses.

In a 1996 program evaluation report on NOAA’s 1995 fleet modernization plan, the Commerce
IG recommended that NOAA terminate its fleet modernization efforts; cease investing in its
ships; immediately begin to decommission, sell, or transfer them; and contract for the
required ship services. The Commerce IG believes that NOAA’s fleet remains a major
management problem and is concerned that NOAA may not be pursuing outsourcing strongly
enough or viewing the fleet issue in a broad enough, governmentwide context. Also, the IG is
concerned that NOAA’s fisheries research acquisition plan and strategy may not be the best
available option for acquiring these ships and may not be fully consistent with the findings
and recommendations in a recent review done for NOAA by a retired Navy admiral. For these
reasons, the Commerce IG included the NOAA fleet issue as one of the 10 most serious
management challenges facing the Department of Commerce in its December 1998 report to
the House leadership.

We have concerns about the Department’s implementation of OMB Circular A-76,
“Performance of Commercial Activities”; the adequacy/completeness of NOAA’s ship cost
comparisons with private sector and other available ships; and its inherent preference for
operating its own ships, rather than contracting out more with the private sector and other
public entities and relying more heavily on them to come up with the ships and/or marine
data that NOAA needs. For example, Commerce has not done a Circular A-76 inventory of its
commercial activities since 1983, and congressional and other pressure accounted for the
single A-76 study it did of one of its ships last year. Over the years, NOAA has been reluctant
to give serious consideration to the many innovative and more modern ways that the private
sector and University-National Oceanographic Laboratory System (UNOLS) potentially could
meet its basic marine data needs.




Page 3                                            GAO/GGD-99-60R Responses to NOAA Fleet Questions
Enclosure
Subcommittee Questions and Our Responses




2. We understand that there are several recent studies on NOAA’s fleet
modernization and NOAA’s plans for its hydrographic and fisheries research
missions. Has GAO reviewed the latest available studies of NOAA’s fleet and
modernization efforts or NOAA’s acquisition plan for its fisheries research mission,
and if so, what have you found?

Answer: We have not had an opportunity to review the latest study of NOAA’s fleet
modernization or NOAA’s acquisition plans for its fisheries research and hydrographic
missions. We asked NOAA for these studies and plans to prepare for the Subcommittee’s
February 24, 1999, hearing. However, NOAA did not give us access to these studies and plans
because it said that they were still under review at the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) and had not yet been made public. We do take some encouragement from the fact
that, according to its fiscal year 1999 and 2000 performance plans, NOAA now envisions
meeting at least one-half of its hydrographic data needs from private sector and UNOLS
resources. Also, it should be noted that NOAA’s long-term plans seem to rely more heavily on
its own ships in the fisheries research area, where the availability and suitability of other
alternatives is the least apparent, and to outsource for most of its data requirements in the
oceanographic and mapping/charting areas.

3. NOAA claims that its ships are cost competitive with those of the private sector
and other public entities and that, in many cases, its ships are less costly to operate
than private charter ships and ships belonging to the University-National
Oceanographic Laboratory System (UNOLS). Has GAO examined the cost efficiency
or effectiveness of NOAA’s ships or compared the costs of NOAA’s ships with those
of private or other available ships?

Answer: We have not reviewed NOAA’s current cost claims. Our work in the costs area,
which is about 5 years old now (Research Fleet Modernization: NOAA Needs to Consider
Alternatives to the Acquisition of New Vessels, GAO/RCED-94-170, Aug. 3, 1994), faulted
NOAA for setting unrealistic conditions for its evaluation of outsourcing alternatives and
raised serious questions about NOAA’s claims and the basis on which NOAA founded those
claims. The Commerce IG has done more current and in-depth work in this area. In a 1996
report, the IG compared the costs of operating specific NOAA ships with the costs of charters
available from the larger UNOLS fleet and from the even more extensive resources of the
private sector. The IG’s report made a convincing case that the outsourcing alternatives at
that time were less expensive.

As a general proposition, we have found that, once federal assets like ships and airplanes
exist, it seems cheaper to operate them than to contract for services, since the capital and
associated fixed operating costs are already sunk. In the federal civilian passenger-carrying
aircraft area, for example, OMB guidelines require only that federal agencies compare the
variable costs of operating those aircraft with the costs of commercially available alternatives




Page 4                                            GAO/GGD-99-60R Responses to NOAA Fleet Questions
Enclosure
Subcommittee Questions and Our Responses




in justifying the flight-by-flight use of the government-owned aircraft. Also, the more
government-owned ships or aircraft are used, the more cost-effective they appear to be
because usage lowers their average hourly or daily cost. Thus, the key question is whether to
acquire the assets in the first place.

4. The President’s budget for fiscal year 2000 proposes $52 million for construction
of a new replacement NOAA fisheries research ship and indicates that NOAA plans
to spend a total of $185 million for four new replacement fisheries research ships
over the 5-year period ending in 2004. Has GAO reviewed these construction plans
or the supporting NOAA analyses that were used to justify these new acquisitions,
and if so, what have you found?

Answer: We have not reviewed these plans or analyses. NOAA told us in February 1999 that
these plans and analyses were still under review by OMB and therefore not available for our
review. As stated earlier, we had hoped to review these plans and analyses to help us prepare
for the Subcommittee’s February 24, 1999, hearing.

Although we have not reviewed NOAA’s construction plans or supporting cost justifications,
we understand that the Commerce IG has reviewed at least some of them. In any event, it
seems to us that the key questions are (1) how does NOAA treat or consider capital costs in
comparing the cost competitiveness of its in-house ships with those available on an
outsourcing basis from private industry or UNOLS and (2) does NOAA express its marine
data needs in terms that allow the private sector and other public entities to apply more
efficient technologies and different ship configurations.

5. Your statement says the issue of replacing the NOAA fleet is entwined with the
issue of the NOAA Corps. Please explain how these issues are interrelated.
                                                                                    th
Answer: The NOAA Corps is something of an anachronism, dating back to the 19 century
when mapping and charting by government mariners were peacetime functions of the Army
and the Navy. Today, the NOAA Corps exists primarily to manage and operate NOAA’s in-
house fleet of research and survey ships. NOAA Corps officers also do rotational shore duty
in NOAA’s five line offices. The rotational pattern of NOAA Corps officers is one-third of their
career at sea, one-third on shore duty related to ship support, and one-third assigned to other
NOAA billets. It should be noted that the Commerce IG has criticized the latter rotational
pattern as not critical to or paid for by other NOAA missions.

If there were no NOAA fleet, there would be no justification for the NOAA Corps as a
separate service. In 1995, NPR, noting that the NOAA Corps was the smallest uniformed
service and that the fleet it commanded was obsolete, recommended that the NOAA Corps be
gradually reduced in number and eventually eliminated.




Page 5                                            GAO/GGD-99-60R Responses to NOAA Fleet Questions
Enclosure
Subcommittee Questions and Our Responses




6. NOAA says that it has downsized the NOAA Corps from over 400 officers in 1994
to about 240 officers at the beginning of Fiscal Year 1999 and achieved annual cost
savings of at least $6 million. Has GAO reviewed NOAA’s reported downsizing of the
NOAA Corps, and if so, what have you found?

Answer: We have not reviewed NOAA’s reported downsizing of its NOAA Corps. However, in
1996 we (1) reported on the anomaly of NOAA (and the Public Health Service) being paid
military benefits and allowances while not meeting the Department of Defense’s criteria and
principles for a military compensation system and (2) compared the costs of the NOAA billets
that existed at that time with civilian pay and benefits for the same positions. In October
1997, we testified before a Senate Subcommittee on issues relating to the civilianization of the
NOAA Corps. In December 1997, we responded to several post-hearing questions on NOAA’s
plan and proposed legislation to downsize and civilianize the NOAA Corps. These GAO
products are footnoted in our prepared statement for the Subcommittee’s February 24, 1999,
hearing.

While we have not reviewed NOAA’s downsizing of the NOAA Corps and claimed cost
savings, the Commerce IG did review NOAA’s 1997 plan and legislative proposal to downsize
and civilianize the NOAA Corps. In this regard, the IG recommended downsizing the NOAA
Corps to achieve significant cost savings and management efficiencies and expressed serious
concerns about NOAA’s plan and legislative proposal. Congress had its own ideas and, in
Public Law 105-384, authorized a NOAA Corps slightly larger than today’s.




Page 6                                            GAO/GGD-99-60R Responses to NOAA Fleet Questions
Ordering Information

The first copy of each GAO report and testimony is free. Additional
copies are $2 each. Orders should be sent to the following address,
accompanied by a check or money order made out to the
Superintendent of Documents, when necessary. VISA and
MasterCard credit cards are accepted, also. Orders for 100 or more
copies to be mailed to a single address are discounted 25 percent.

Order by mail:

U.S. General Accounting Office
P.O. Box 37050
Washington, DC 20013

or visit:

Room 1100
     th                  th
700 4 St. NW (corner of 4 and G Sts. NW)
U.S. General Accounting Office
Washington, DC

Orders may also be placed by calling (202) 512-6000 or by using fax
number (202) 512-6061, or TDD (202) 512-2537.

Each day, GAO issues a list of newly available reports and testimony.
To receive facsimile copies of the daily list or any list from the past
30 days, please call (202) 512-6000 using a touch-tone phone. A
recorded menu will provide information on how to obtain these
lists.

For information on how to access GAO reports on the INTERNET,
send e-mail message with “info” in the body to:

info@www.gao.gov

or visit GAO’s World Wide Web Home Page at:

http://www.gao.gov
United States                       Bulk Rate
General Accounting Office      Postage & Fees Paid
Washington, D.C. 20548-0001           GAO
                                Permit No. G100
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300

Address Correction Requested




(410437)