oversight

Securities and Exchange Commission: Cross-Border Tender and Exchange Offers, Business Combinations and Rights Offerings

Published by the Government Accountability Office on 1999-11-19.

Below is a raw (and likely hideous) rendition of the original report. (PDF)

United States General Accounting Office                                Office of the General Counsel
Washington, DC 20548



          B-284104


          November 19, 1999

          The Honorable Phil Gramm
          Chairman
          The Honorable Paul S. Sarbanes
          Ranking Minority Member
          Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs
          United States Senate

          The Honorable Thomas J. Bliley, Jr.
          Chairman
          The Honorable John D. Dingell
          Ranking Minority Member
          Committee on Commerce
          House of Representatives

          Subject: Securities and Exchange Commission: Cross-Border Tender and Exchange
                   Offers, Business Combinations and Rights Offerings

          Pursuant to section 801(a)(2)(A) of title 5, United States Code, this is our report on a
          major rule promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission, entitled
          “Cross-Border Tender and Exchange Offers, Business Combinations and Rights
          Offerings” (RIN: 3235-AD97). We received the rule on October 26, 1999. It was
          published in the Federal Register as a final rule on November 10, 1999. 64 Fed. Reg.
          61382.

          The final rule contains tender offer and Securities Act registration exemptive rules
          for cross-border tender and exchange offers, business combinations, and rights
          offerings relating to the securities of foreign companies. The purpose of the
          exemptions is to facilitate U.S. investor participation in these types of transactions.

          Enclosed is our assessment of the SEC’s compliance with the procedural steps
          required by section 801(a)(1)(B)(i) through (iv) of title 5 with respect to the rule.
          Our review indicates that the SEC complied with the applicable requirements.

          If you have any questions about this report, please contact James W. Vickers,
          Assistant General Counsel, at (202) 512-8210. The official responsible for GAO
          evaluation work relating to the subject matter of the rule is Thomas McCool,



                                                                                      GAO/OGC-00-11
Director, Financial Institutions and Markets Issues. Mr. McCool can be reached at
(202) 512-8678.

Sincerely yours,




Robert P. Murphy
General Counsel

Enclosure

cc: Ms. Margaret H. McFarland
    Deputy Secretary, Securities and
     Exchange Commission




Page 2                                                                 GAO/OGC-00-11
                                                                          ENCLOSURE

        ANALYSIS UNDER 5 U.S.C. § 801(a)(1)(B)(i)-(iv) OF A MAJOR RULE
                              ISSUED BY THE
                 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                                 ENTITLED
             "CROSS-BORDER TENDER AND EXCHANGE OFFERS,
            BUSINESS COMBINATIONS AND RIGHTS OFFERINGS"
                             (RIN: 3235-AD97)

(i) Cost-benefit analysis

Although the SEC is not required to prepare a formal cost-benefit analysis, it is
required to consider the effects of the rule on competition under Section 23(a) of the
Exchange Act and whether the rule will promote efficiency, competition, and capital
formation under the National Securities Markets Improvement Act of 1996.

In total, the SEC finds that the rule will benefit U.S. security holders by removing
regulatory barriers to including such holders in these types of offers.

(ii) Agency actions relevant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 603-605,
607, and 609

The Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis was incorporated in the Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking and a summary of the Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
(FRFA) is included in the preamble to the final rule.

Both analyses provide the information required by the Act and include the reasons
for the agency action, its objectives, legal basis, and the reporting and recordkeeping
requirements. The FRFA discusses the alternatives which were considered and the
reasons why certain ones were chosen to reduce the burdens on small entities.

(iii) Agency actions relevant to sections 202-205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. §§ 1532-1535

As an independent regulatory agency, the SEC is not subject to title II of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995.

(iv) Other relevant information or requirements under acts and executive orders

Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq.

The final rule was issued using the notice and comment procedures contained in
5 U.S.C. 553.




                                                                           GAO/OGC-00-11
On November 13, 1998, the SEC published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM)
in the Federal Register. 63 Fed. Reg. 69136. The SEC received 19 letters of comment
in response to the NPRM and discusses the comments in the preamble to the final
rule.

Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. §§ 3501-3520

The final rule contains information collections that are subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act. The
collections have been approved by OMB and issued OMB control numbers 3235-0518
and 3235-0379.

Statutory authorization for the rule

The final rule is issued pursuant to the authority of sections 3(b), 7, 8, 10, 19, and 28
of the Securities Act, sections 12, 13, 14, 23, and 36 of the Exchange Act, and section
304 of the Trust Indenture Act.

Executive Order No. 12866

As the rule is promulgated by an independent regulatory agency, it is not subject to
the review requirements of Executive Order No. 12866.




Page 2                                                                      GAO/OGC-00-11