oversight

FCC: Non-Voice, Non-Geostationary Mobile Satellite Service

Published by the Government Accountability Office on 1997-11-12.

Below is a raw (and likely hideous) rendition of the original report. (PDF)

      United States
GAO   General Accounting Office
      Washington, D.C. 20548

      Office of the General Counsel


      B-278520



      November 12, 1997

      The Honorable John McCain
      Chairman
      The Honorable Ernest F. Hollings
      Ranking Minority Member
      Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation
      United States Senate

      The Honorable Thomas J. Bliley, Jr.
      Chairman
      The Honorable John D. Dingell
      Ranking Minority Member
      Committee on Commerce
      House of Representatives

      Subject:   Federal Communications Commission: Non-Voice, Non-Geostationary
                 Mobile Satellite Service

      Pursuant to section 801(a)(2)(A) of title 5, United States Code, this is our report on
      a major rule promulgated by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC),
      entitled "Non-Voice, Non-Geostationary Mobile Satellite Service" (IB Docket No.
      96-220; FCC 97-370). We received the rule on October 28, 1997. It was published in
      the Federal Register as a final rule on November 3, 1997. 62 Fed. Reg. 59293.

      The final rule specifies a spectrum sharing plan and service rules for applicants in
      the non-voice, non-geosynchronous mobile satellite service second processing
      round. These satellite systems providing this service, also referred to as "Little
      LEO" service, use a constellation of low-Earth orbiting (LEO) satellites to offer a
      variety of data communications services, including, but not limited to, remote meter
      reading, vehicle tracking, and two-way data messaging services to customers
      anywhere in the world.

      Enclosed is our assessment of the FCC's compliance with the procedural steps
      required by section 801(a)(1)(B)(i) through (iv) of title 5 with respect to the rule.
      Our review indicates that the FCC complied with the applicable requirements.



                                                                            GAO/OGC-98-11
Our Office has issued two reports recently involving satellite services--
Telecommunications: Competition Issues in International Satellite Communications
(GAO/RCED-97-1) and Telecommunications: Competitive Impact of Restructuring
the International Satellite Organizations (GAO/RCED-96-204).

If you have any questions about this report, please contact James Vickers, Assistant
General Counsel, at (202) 512-8210. The official responsible for GAO evaluation
work relating to the Federal Communications Commission is John Anderson,
Director of Transportation Issues. Mr. Anderson can be reached at (202) 512-2834.




Robert P. Murphy
General Counsel

Enclosure

cc: Mr. Peter W. Herrick
    AMD-Performance Evaluation and
     Records Management
    Federal Communications Commission




Page 2                                                             GAO/OGC-98-11
                                                                         ENCLOSURE

       ANALYSIS UNDER 5 U.S.C. § 801(a)(1)(B)(i)-(iv) OF A MAJOR RULE
                                ISSUED BY
               THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
                                ENTITLED
       "NON-VOICE, NON-GEOSTATIONARY MOBILE SATELLITE SERVICE"
                     (IB Docket No. 96-220; FCC 97-370)

(i) Cost-benefit analysis

The Commission, in its report to our Office, states that it was not required to
prepare and did not prepare a cost-benefit analysis of the final rule.

(ii) Agency actions relevant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 603-605,
607, and 609

The FCC prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) and published
the analysis as an appendix to the notice of proposed rulemaking.

In the final rule, the FCC presents its Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA)
and notes that it did not receive any comments specifically related to the IRFA.
The FRFA discusses the need for and objective of the final rule, a description and
estimate of the number of small entities to which the rule will apply, the reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, and the steps the FCC took to minimize the
economic burden on small entities.

The FCC notes that two of the five applicants in the second processing round are
small entities (i.e., having less than $11 million in annual receipts). Because all of
the applicants reached agreement on the spectrum sharing plan, which is adopted in
this final rule, all second round applicants' systems designs are accommodated,
including existing licensees. Therefore, the FCC was able to adopt their relaxed
financial standard rather than the strict financial standard proposed in the notice of
proposed rulemaking. This will enable small entities and start-up companies the
opportunity to compete in the capital intensive satellite industry according to the
FRFA.

(iii) Agency actions relevant to sections 202-205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. §§ 1532-1535

As an independent regulatory agency, the Commission is not subject to title II of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995.




                                                                     GAO/OGC-98-11
(iv) Other relevant information or requirements under acts and executive orders

Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq.

The final rule was promulgated using the notice and comment procedures in
5 U.S.C. § 553. The FCC issued a notice of proposed rulemaking by publication in
the Federal Register on December 31, 1996. 61 Fed. Reg. 69062.

In the full Report and Order which was submitted to our Office and which is
summarized in the Federal Register, the FCC discusses the comments it received
and the actions it took in response to the comments.

Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. §§ 3501-3520

The final rule does not contain any information collection requirements which are
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork
Reduction Act because the rule applies to less than 10 persons. 44 U.S.C.
§ 3502(4)(a).

Statutory authorization for the rule

The final rule was promulgated pursuant to sections 1, 4, 303(r), and 309(j) of the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 303(r), and 309(j).

Executive Order No. 12866

The rule, promulgated by an independent regulatory agency, is not subject to the
review requirements of Executive Order No. 12866.




Page 2                                                             GAO/OGC-98-11