United States General Accounting Office GAO Report to Congressional Committees June 1999 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Coordinated Federal Efforts Are Being Undertaken to Address Harmful Algae GAO/RCED-99-192 United States GAO General Accounting Office Washington, D.C. 20548 Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division B-282701 June 30, 1999 The Honorable John Mica Chairman, Subcommittee on Criminal Justice, Drug Policy, and Human Resources Committee on Government Reform House of Representatives The Honorable Christopher Shays Chairman, Subcommittee on National Security, Veterans Affairs, and International Relations Committee on Government Reform House of Representatives Dear Mr. Chairman: Outbreaks of the toxic algae Pfiesteria in the Chesapeake Bay and in North Carolina estuaries have received national attention. These outbreaks are part of a larger problem of harmful algae that represent a significant and expanding threat to human health and marine resources along the U.S. coastline and around the world. While marine algae are present in all oceans and coastal areas, they become a problem when certain species rapidly multiply, leading to large blooms that can produce toxins.1 In light of harmful algae’s potential threat, you requested that we (1) discuss the available information on harmful algae and their effects on human health and the environment and (2) describe the status of federal efforts to address the problem of harmful algae, particularly the coordination of research and management strategies among the federal agencies. According to the most current research, the toxins produced by harmful Results in Brief algae can affect human health and marine ecosystems in various ways. These toxins—among the most potent chemical compounds known—can kill or injure fish that come in direct contact with them and can accumulate in the tissues of fish and shellfish at levels that are harmful or lethal when ingested by larger fish, sea birds, marine mammals, or humans. Symptoms of algae poisoning in humans are neurological (headaches, dizziness, memory loss, and impairment of motor function); gastrointestinal; and cardiovascular. With respect to marine ecosystems, 1 For purposes of this report, we use the term “harmful algae” to refer to these blooms. Page 1 GAO/RCED-99-192 Environmental Protection B-282701 as the algae outgrow the nutrients available to sustain them, their blooms die, and their decomposition depletes the concentration of dissolved oxygen in the water. The lack of oxygen causes the death of aquatic organisms present in marine ecosystems. Outbreaks of harmful algae appear to be increasing in scope, frequency, and intensity, and their economic impacts are likely to increase. Federal efforts to protect the public from harmful algae started in 1992 with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s sponsorship of a workshop for government agencies and other research organizations. This workshop led to the publication of a report entitled Marine Biotoxins and Harmful Algae: A National Plan. Prior to 1992, federal efforts were generally restricted to responding on a case-by-case basis to new outbreaks. The national plan set in place an ongoing interagency process for addressing certain objectives and resulted, in 1996, in the establishment of an interagency coordination program. Under this program, five federal agencies have provided approximately $22 million for basic research projects directed at better understanding the scientific uncertainties associated with harmful algae. Although the initial research projects were funded in 1997, outbreaks of Pfiesteria in the Chesapeake Bay focused national attention on the problem and resulted in the funding of additional projects in 1998. Since most projects are long-term research efforts, significant progress in protecting public health and the environment may be many years away. A scientific panel also recommended, in 1997, the creation of a program to complement basic research efforts by focusing on the coordination of federal efforts to prevent, mitigate, and control harmful algae. After finding that little has been done at the federal level to prevent and control harmful algae, , the Congress enacted the Harmful Algal Bloom and Hypoxia Research and Control Act of 1998 (P.L. 105-383, Nov. 13, 1998), which required the creation of an interagency task force to address the problem. Over the past 25 years, the observed incidence and intensity of harmful Background algae have increased substantially. Marine biotoxins and harmful algae have affected coastal ecosystems throughout the United States and the world. Marine algae, which are present in all ocean and coastal areas, are generally benign and form a critical part of the food web. Among the thousands of species of algae, only a few dozen are known to produce toxins or conditions that adversely affect other marine life, wildlife, and humans. Scientists have not identified all the factors that cause some algae species to shift from benign to toxic forms. Page 2 GAO/RCED-99-192 Environmental Protection B-282701 When conditions (nutrients, temperature, ocean currents) are favorable, the algae population rapidly increases. Although the reasons for harmful algae in U.S. waters are unclear, some possibilities include natural transportation by tides and currents and the transportation of algae species in ships’ ballast water. Available data also indicate that algae increase in areas where there is an abundance of nutrients, such as phosphorus and nitrogen, in the water, and these increases can include increases in harmful species. These nutrients largely result from human activities, such as increases in animal waste because of concentrated animal agriculture, farm and urban runoff, sewage, and other types of pollution. We have previously reported on the impacts of animal waste and other types of nonpoint-source water pollution.2 Harmful algae have significant economic impacts, including the costs to federal, state, and local governments for conducting research and monitoring programs and expenditures for the medical treatment of exposed populations. Economic losses are difficult to estimate and fluctuate widely from year to year. While an estimate of the annual economic impacts resulting from harmful algae in the United States is still being developed by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) National Office for Marine Biotoxins and Harmful Algal Blooms, preliminary analyses indicate an average annual impact of over $42 million for 1987 through 1993. These estimated losses are attributed to reduced harvests of shellfish and fish, reductions in seafood sales, and reductions in tourism-related businesses. Harmful algae can have significant economic impacts on the individual areas affected. In fact, 1997 Pfiesteria outbreaks in the Chesapeake Bay resulted in the collapse of Chesapeake seafood sales and boat charters, causing an estimated $43 million in losses for watermen, seafood dealers, and restaurants. According to the Deputy Director of NOAA’s Coastal Ocean Office, harmful algae outbreaks are increasing in scope, frequency, and intensity, and the annual economic impacts are likely to continue to increase. Harmful algae represent a significant and expanding threat to human Harmful Algae Can health and marine environments in the United States. According to the Adversely Affect Director of NOAA’s National Office for Marine Biotoxins and Harmful Algal Human Health and the Blooms, humans are vulnerable to illness from consuming fish or shellfish contaminated with the toxins produced by harmful algae, or in some Environment cases, from contact with the skin or from inhaling spray from water 2 See Water Quality: Federal Role in Addressing and Contributing to Nonpoint Source Pollution (GAO/RCED-99-45; Feb. 26, 1999); and Animal Agriculture: Information on Waste Management and Water Quality Issues (GAO/RCED-95-200BR; Jun. 28, 1995). Page 3 GAO/RCED-99-192 Environmental Protection B-282701 contaminated with toxins from harmful algae. Large quantities of fish and marine mammals, turtles, and birds that come in direct contact with the toxins produced by harmful algae can be killed or injured. In addition, the algae can alter marine habitats, including degrading aquatic vegetation and phytoplankton3. Because aquatic vegetation and phytoplankton are the foundation of the marine food chain, their decline decreases the overall ecological productivity of an affected area. Impacts on Human Health NOAA has reported that algae are responsible for significant health problems in the United States and the world. The toxins they produce are among the most potent chemical compounds known. Humans are exposed to these toxins primarily when they consume contaminated seafood. The consumption of a single clam or mussel contaminated with certain algal toxins can be fatal.4 Some of the more common human illnesses caused by these toxins are discussed below. See figure 1 for the affected areas. • Paralytic shellfish poisoning is a life threatening illness associated with the consumption of shellfish or certain fish containing a class of algal toxins that affect the neurological system. Symptoms appear shortly after eating the food, and in the most severe cases, respiratory arrest occurs within 24 hours. With medical support, victims usually recover within 12 hours. Large-scale monitoring programs to identify toxin levels in mussels, oysters, scallops, and other shellfish and the rapid closure of harvest areas suspected of containing toxin-infested waters are the methods used to address the problem. All of the coastal New England states and much of the West Coast, from Alaska to California, have been affected. • Neurotoxic shellfish poisoning affects individuals who eat shellfish that have accumulated a class of algal toxins called brevetoxins. Although there are no reported human deaths from neurotoxic shellfish poisoning, the poisoning causes severe gastrointestinal and neurological symptoms. Also, individuals who come into contact with this toxin through sea spray experience asthma-like symptoms. Beach clean-up efforts and public health advisories are used to manage fish kills and other ecological problems associated with the toxin-producing algae. The states that are most affected include Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas. • Amnesic shellfish poisoning, a sometimes fatal illness, results in a variety of gastrointestinal and neurological disorders, including nausea, 3 Phytoplankton (small plant organisms) are algae that include harmful species that float or drift in the water. 4 The Food and Drug Administration provides public information and education on its Seafood Hotline (1-800-332-4010) and web page (www.foodsafety.gov). Page 4 GAO/RCED-99-192 Environmental Protection B-282701 abdominal cramps, dizziness, seizures, disorientation, respiratory difficulty, and short-term memory loss. Research has shown that domoic acid, the toxin responsible for amnesic poisoning, accumulates in fish, crabs, and other fisheries resources, and in marine mammals, making it a significant risk to humans. The toxin was first identified in Canada in 1987 and has been detected in shellfish from both the west and east coasts of the United States and in the Gulf of Mexico. Incidents of amnesic shellfish poisonings have increased in recent years. • Ciguatera fish poisoning is associated with algal toxins called ciguatoxins, which accumulate in tropical fish. Victims experience gastrointestinal, neurological, and cardiovascular symptoms. While incidences of paralysis and death have been documented, the symptoms are usually less severe and will either subside within a few days or continue for several years. Information reported to the Department of Health and Human Services’ Centers for Disease Control and Prevention indicates that ciguatera fish poisoning is responsible for about half of all seafood poisonings in the United States. Ciguatera poisoning is estimated to affect up to 50 percent of the people living in tropical and subtropical states and territories, such as the U. S. Virgin Islands. • Pfiesteria and closely related organisms have been linked to massive fish kills and to living fish with open, bleeding lesions or erratic behavior. Researchers exposed to mist from laboratory tanks containing toxic Pfiesteria experienced severe memory problems and other neurological and pulmonary effects that persisted for months to years. People who have been in contact with affected waterways during a Pfiesteria outbreak have experienced memory loss, headache, skin lesions, and burning sensations on the skin. Pfiesteria and Pfiesteria-like species have been identified in estuaries from Delaware to Florida. Page 5 GAO/RCED-99-192 Environmental Protection B-282701 Figure 1: Distribution of Toxic Algae in the United States Paralytic shellfish poisoning Neurotoxic shellfish poisoning Amnesic shellfish poisoning Ciguatera fish poisoning Toxic Pfiesteria Source: National Ocean Service, Center for Coastal Environmental Health and Biomolecular Research. Page 6 GAO/RCED-99-192 Environmental Protection B-282701 Effects on Marine Algal toxins present major ecological threats to marine environments. Ecosystems Different types of harmful algae can affect marine ecosystems. Red tides5 have been linked to massive fish kills in the Gulf of Mexico. They are found most frequently along Florida’s west coast, where they were noted as early as 1844. In the 50 years between 1946 and 1996, 42 red tides were observed along Florida’s west coast. During a red tide, it is common to find dead birds and fish. Red tides have also been blamed for the deaths of large numbers of dolphins and manatees, including more than 150 endangered manatees in Florida in 1996. In 1997, an estimated 21 million fish were killed by a red tide off the Texas coast. (See fig. 2.) 5 The term “red tide” refers to the concentration of algae that colors the water. Page 7 GAO/RCED-99-192 Environmental Protection B-282701 Figure 2: Dead Fish From Red Tides on the Florida and Texas Coasts Dead Fish in Red Tide Off the Florida Coast Beached Dead Fish Caused by a Texas Red Tide Sources: National Office for Marine Biotoxins and Harmful Algal Blooms,Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution and ECOHAB, A National Research Agenda, photo by Brazosports Pfiesteria has also been implicated in significant environmental events in the coastal waters of the Mid-Atlantic States. The toxins produced by the Pfiesteria organism are believed to have killed more than one billion fish Page 8 GAO/RCED-99-192 Environmental Protection B-282701 in the coastal waters of North Carolina and more than 30,000 fish in coastal tributaries in Maryland. Fish exposed to Pfiesteria are stunned and develop sores. (See fig. 3.) Pfiesteria and Pfiesteria-like organisms have been identified in the waters from Delaware to Florida. Figure 3: Fish Killed by Pfiesteria Source: Dr. JoAnn Burkholder, Aquatic Botany Laboratory, North Carolina State University. Page 9 GAO/RCED-99-192 Environmental Protection B-282701 Even those algae that do not produce toxins can be dangerous to the marine environment. For example, as they use up the nutrients needed to sustain them, the algae die and decompose, depleting dissolved oxygen in the water and causing hypoxia—low oxygen concentrations—and anoxia—no oxygen. Large hypoxic areas, or dead zones, such as the one that forms each year in the northern Gulf of Mexico, result from the death of massive but largely nontoxic harmful algae. Coordinated federal efforts to protect the public from harmful algae Coordinated Federal started in 1992 with a workshop sponsored by the National Oceanic and Efforts Are Being Atmospheric Administration. This workshop led to the 1993 publication of Undertaken a report entitled Marine Biotoxins and Harmful Algae: A National Plan. Prior to 1992, federal efforts were generally restricted to responding on a case-by-case basis to new outbreaks of harmful algae. The national plan set in place an ongoing interagency process for addressing the objectives set out in the plan and resulted, in 1996, in the creation of the interagency Ecology and Oceanography of Harmful Algal Blooms (ECOHAB) program. While the objectives in the national plan (see below) are still current, funding limitations have delayed the start of many of the projects addressing the objectives. For example, the ECOHAB program began funding several large regional projects in 1997. At the same time, however, the outbreaks of Pfiesteria in Maryland during the summer of 1997 tended to focus national attention on the need to take action against harmful algae, and, as a result, additional projects were funded in 1998. Because most of these projects have only recently gotten under way and have multiyear time frames, significant progress in protecting the public from harmful algae is still many years away. Coordinated Efforts to The 1992 NOAA sponsored workshop brought scientists and regulatory Learn About and Manage officials together to address the problems of harmful algae. This workshop the Effects of Harmful resulted in the 1993 publication of a national plan—Marine Biotoxins and Harmful Algae: A National Plan—for conducting basic research and Algae developing management and mitigation strategies to protect the public and the environment from problems associated with harmful algae. In the plan, representatives from federal and state government, academia, and industry stated that the U. S. research, monitoring, and regulatory infrastructure is not adequate to meet the expanding threats from harmful algae and established the goal of effectively managing fisheries, public health, and ecosystem problems. According to the plan, the following eight specific Page 10 GAO/RCED-99-192 Environmental Protection B-282701 research objectives must be addressed to comprehensively evaluate, model, and manage harmful algae and its impacts: • isolating algae toxins and characterizing their chemical and pharmacological actions, • developing tests to identify individual toxins based on their unique chemistry, • developing the capability to predict the occurrence and assess the impacts of harmful algae. • determining the source and consequences of algae toxins in the marine food web. • developing management and mitigation strategies to minimize the impacts of harmful algae, • identifying and improving access to databases on toxic algae occurrences and impacts. • developing programs to communicate educational and public health information, and • providing rapid response programs for harmful algae outbreaks. The national plan set in place an interagency process for addressing these objectives. A December 1995 report—The Ecology and Oceanography of Harmful Algal Blooms: A National Research Agenda—serves as a blueprint for carrying out the federal research program on the ecology and oceanography of harmful algae. This report resulted in the establishment of the ECOHAB program, the first federally coordinated effort dedicated to conducting the basic research necessary to understand the nature of harmful algae, the reasons they occur, and the steps that can be taken to control them. Under the auspices of the ECOHAB program, five federal agencies—NOAA, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the National Science Foundation (NSF), the Office of Naval Research (ONR), and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)—have funded research projects that are carried out in-house or by universities and other organizations. Other agencies, including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) are involved Page 11 GAO/RCED-99-192 Environmental Protection B-282701 in conducting research and disseminating information to the public on harmful algae. Research supported by CDC and NIEHS primarily focuses on the human health effects that result from exposure to water or aerosols containing harmful algae, while FDA’s research focuses on the human health effects from exposure to toxins from consuming seafood. Collectively, these agencies spent more than $40 million in 1997 and 1998 on these efforts. (See table 1.) Table 1: ECOHAB and Other Key Agency Funding for Research on Research organizations 1997 1998 Harmful Algae ECOHAB (NOAA, EPA, NSF, ONR, NASA)a $10,200,000 $11,700,000 CDC $0 $7,000,000 National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences $975,000 $2,400,000 Food and Drug Administration $4,200,000 $4,200,000 Total $15,400,000 $25,300,000 a These amounts represent the total funding for multiyear projects. Before the ECOHAB program, research on the effects of harmful algae was typically isolated and uncoordinated. Often, the research was carried out by individual scientists and was not sustained over time. Before the program, there was essentially no overall federal coordination of the work to ensure that important national priorities were being addressed. A second report was issued in February 1997. Developed on the basis of the objectives in the national plan, Harmful Algal Blooms in Coastal Waters: Options for Prevention, Control and Mitigation describes the processes and mechanisms that need to be employed to control harmful algae and their impacts. According to NOAA officials, this report is the basis for new initiatives for intervention strategies to deal with harmful algae to minimize human health, ecological, and economic impacts. The National Harmful Algal Bloom Research and Monitoring Strategy, published in November 1997, presents a national strategy for federally-supported research and monitoring for problems associated with harmful algae, particularly Pfiesteria and Pfiesteria-like organisms. The report is intended to serve as an action plan for Pfiesteria research and monitoring within the framework of the broader objectives identified in the national plan. In November 1998, NOAA published The Status of U.S. Page 12 GAO/RCED-99-192 Environmental Protection B-282701 Harmful Algal Blooms: Progress Towards a National Program, which described a number of interagency programs designed to understand and ameliorate the impacts of harmful algae without attempting to provide a quantitative assessment of progress. Addressing Harmful Algae Research on harmful algae is generally long-term. Most ECOHAB-sponsored Problems Is a Long-Term research projects are just getting under way, including two 5-year Process multidisciplinary programs to study toxic algal blooms in the Gulfs of Maine and of Mexico. Some delays have been encountered. According to NOAA officials and several key researchers, there has been a significant delay in identifying the chemical composition of the Pfiesteria toxins. They stated that researchers cannot get enough Pfiesteria toxins to characterize their chemical and molecular structure. Massive amounts of tiny algal cells must be isolated in pure laboratory cultures to produce enough toxins for the analyses. Thus far, the Aquatic Botany Laboratory at North Carolina State University has been the only facility able to provide significant quantities of toxic Pfiesteria cultures to the scientific community. According to the laboratory director, funding limitations have precluded the facility from producing sufficient quantities of the toxins for identification and characterization. Until toxin supplies for Pfiesteria and other harmful algae are increased and the chemical analyses are completed, other important research objectives, such as developing management and mitigation strategies to minimize the impact on human health and the environment, are unlikely to be achieved. Recognizing that many of ECOHAB’s research projects represent long term efforts and are primarily directed to resolving scientific uncertainties, a 1997 scientific panel recommended the creation of a federal program that would complement the ECOHAB program by focusing on the prevention, mitigation, and control of harmful algae. While NOAA, EPA, and other federal agencies have conducted or supported efforts in this area, the efforts have generally been carried out in a piecemeal manner, as basic research was done before the ECOHAB program. For example, after the 1997 outbreak of Pfiesteria in Maryland and Virginia, the administration created an ad hoc interagency task force to assist the states in preventing, mitigating, and controlling Pfiesteria. Similar efforts for other harmful algal species, however, have not been established, and, in September 1998, the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation reported that little had been done at the federal level to prevent and control harmful algae given the scope and seriousness of the problem. Page 13 GAO/RCED-99-192 Environmental Protection B-282701 The Congress Has In November 1998, the Congress enacted the Harmful Algal Bloom and Mandated an Interagency Hypoxia Research and Control Act of 1998, which is focused on federal Effort on Harmful Algae prevention, mitigation, and control efforts. The act requires the establishment of an interagency task force on harmful algal blooms and Toxins hypoxia. Task force members include representatives of NOAA (serving as chair), EPA, the National Science Foundation, the Food and Drug Administration, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the Office of Science and Technology Policy, the Council on Environmental Quality, and the departments of Agriculture, Interior, Navy, and Health and Human Services. Among other things, the task force is required to complete an assessment of the ecological and economic consequences of harmful algae; develop alternatives for reducing, mitigating, and controlling the outbreaks of blooms; and examining the social and economic costs and benefits of such alternatives. In addition, the assessment should identify alternatives for preventing unnecessary duplication of effort among federal agencies and departments and provide for federal assistance to the states and local governments in preventing, reducing, managing, mitigating, and controlling harmful algae and its public health and environmental impacts. The assessment is to be submitted to the Congress by November 13, 1999. We provided a draft of this report to NOAA and EPA for their review and Agency Comments comment since they are the lead agencies for coordinating federal efforts to address the problems of harmful algae. The agencies generally agreed that the report accurately describes what is known about the effects of harmful algae on human health and the environment and the federal efforts to address the problem. In commenting on the report, NOAA stated that it is committed to reducing the impacts of harmful algae on U.S. coastal resources, economies, and public health. NOAA also made a number of specific technical suggestions, which we incorporated into the report as appropriate. EPA said that the report provided an accurate and informative summary of the issues. EPA also made several observations about the report. First, EPA stated the draft did not address the problem of mitigating and controlling harmful algae and pointed out that while the Ecology and Oceanography of Harmful Algal Blooms program is doing research on the impacts of harmful algae, it is not addressing current efforts to mitigate the problem. The draft report discussed mitigation efforts, including information on the interagency task force created by the Harmful Algal Bloom and Hypoxia Page 14 GAO/RCED-99-192 Environmental Protection B-282701 Research and Control Act of 1998. The task force is intended to complement the Ecology and Oceanography of Harmful Algal Blooms program by coordinating federal efforts to control and mitigate harmful algae. Second, EPA pointed out that Pfiesteria is only one of the toxin-producing organisms requiring research and suggested that the report describe the Ecology and Oceangraphy of Harmful Algal Blooms projects and the level of funding provided by the contributing agencies. The report clearly states that although Pfiesteria outbreaks have received recent attention, the newly created interagency task force is to address alternatives for reducing, mitigating, and controlling all harmful algae that have the potential for affecting human health and the environment. Furthermore, the report provides summary research and funding information. Third, EPA indicated that it would be useful to include information on the ability to detect contaminated seafood before it is made available to consumers. We agree and added information on FDA’s seafood hotline and web site. See appendixes I and II, respectively, for the text of NOAA’s and EPA’s comments. To identify available information on harmful algae and their effects on Scope and human health and the environment, we held discussions with managers Methodology and researchers from the two lead federal agencies for the ECOHAB program—NOAA and EPA—which have also assumed the leadership role for supporting research on the factors responsible for harmful algae and for developing models for predicting future outbreaks. We also interviewed officials from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, and the Food and Drug Administration to discuss their research findings on the human health implications of exposure to algae toxins. We also talked with nationally recognized experts from academia and other organizations involved in research on harmful algae and attended technical conferences at which scientific information on the causes and impacts of harmful algae were presented. We reviewed the national plan for addressing the harmful algae problem and other scientific studies that contain extensive information on the human health and environmental effects associated with harmful algae. To describe the status of federal efforts to address the problem of harmful algae, particularly the coordination of research and management strategies among the federal agencies, we interviewed managers and researchers from the two lead federal agencies for the ECOHAB program, an interagency coordination program established to address the scientific uncertainties Page 15 GAO/RCED-99-192 Environmental Protection B-282701 associated with harmful algae. We interviewed officials from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, and the Food and Drug Administration to discuss the status of their research on the human health implications from exposure to algal toxins. We also talked with nationally recognized experts from academia and other organizations involved in research on harmful algae and attended technical conferences at which information on the status of research on the causes and impacts of harmful algae and the progress in developing management and mitigation strategies was presented. We also reviewed NOAA’s recent report on the status of progress towards developing a national harmful algae program and other studies that address the status and coordination of research on harmful algae. We performed our work from August 1998 through June 1999 in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards. As arranged with your offices, unless you announce its contents earlier, we plan no further distribution of this report until 15 days from the date of this letter. At that time, we will send copies of this report to Senator John McCain, Senator Ernest F. Hollings, Senator Olympia J. Snowe, Senator John F. Kerry, Senator John H. Chafee, Senator Max Baucus, Senator Jesse Helms, Representative Dan Burton, Representative Henry A. Waxman, Representative Patsy T. Mink, Representative Rod R. Blagojevich, and other interested members of Congress. We will also send copies of this report to the Honorable Carol Browner, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency; the Honorable Dr. Jeffrey Koplan, Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; the Honorable Dr. D. James Baker, Administrator, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; the Honorable Dr. Kenneth Olden, Director, the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; and the Honorable Dr. Jane E. Henney, Commissioner, Food and Drug Administration. We will also make copies available to others on request. Page 16 GAO/RCED-99-192 Environmental Protection B-282701 Please call me at (202) 512-6111 if you or your staff have any questions about this report. Major contributors to this report are listed in appendix III. David G. Wood Associate Director, Environmental Protection Issues Page 17 GAO/RCED-99-192 Environmental Protection Contents Letter 1 Appendix I 20 Comments From the Department of Commerce Appendix II 21 Comments From the Environmental Protection Agency Appendix III 23 GAO Contacts and Staff Acknowledgements Table Table 1: ECOHAB and Other Key Agency Funding for Research 12 on Harmful Algae Figures Figure 1: Distribution of Toxic Algae in the United States 6 Figure 2: Dead Fish From Red Tides on the Florida and Texas 8 Coasts Figure 3: Fish Killed by Pfiesteria 9 Abbreviations CDC Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ECOHAB Ecology and Oceangraphy of Harmful Algal Blooms EPA Environmental Protection Agency FDA Food and Drug Administration NIEHS National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences NSF National Science Foundation NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration ONR Office of Naval Research Page 18 GAO/RCED-99-192 Environmental Protection Page 19 GAO/RCED-99-192 Environmental Protection Appendix I Comments From the Department of Commerce Page 20 GAO/RCED-99-192 Environmental Protection Appendix II Comments From the Environmental Protection Agency Page 21 GAO/RCED-99-192 Environmental Protection Appendix II Comments From the Environmental Protection Agency Page 22 GAO/RCED-99-192 Environmental Protection Appendix III GAO Contacts and Staff Acknowledgements David G. Wood (202) 512-6878 GAO Contacts William F. McGee (919) 899-3781 In addition to those named above, Harry C. Everett, Kellie O. Schachle, Acknowledgements Everett O. Pace, Richard A. Frankel, and Karen K. Keegan made key contributions to this report. (160457) Page 23 GAO/RCED-99-192 Environmental Protection Ordering Information The first copy of each GAO report and testimony is free. Additional copies are $2 each. Orders should be sent to the following address, accompanied by a check or money order made out to the Superintendent of Documents, when necessary. VISA and MasterCard credit cards are accepted, also. Orders for 100 or more copies to be mailed to a single address are discounted 25 percent. Orders by mail: U.S. General Accounting Office P.O. Box 37050 Washington, DC 20013 or visit: Room 1100 700 4th St. NW (corner of 4th and G Sts. NW) U.S. General Accounting Office Washington, DC Orders may also be placed by calling (202) 512-6000 or by using fax number (202) 512-6061, or TDD (202) 512-2537. Each day, GAO issues a list of newly available reports and testimony. To receive facsimile copies of the daily list or any list from the past 30 days, please call (202) 512-6000 using a touchtone phone. A recorded menu will provide information on how to obtain these lists. For information on how to access GAO reports on the INTERNET, send an e-mail message with "info" in the body to: firstname.lastname@example.org or visit GAO’s World Wide Web Home Page at: http://www.gao.gov PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER United States Bulk Rate General Accounting Office Postage & Fees Paid Washington, D.C. 20548-0001 GAO Permit No. G100 Official Business Penalty for Private Use $300 Address Correction Requested
Environmental Protection: Coordinated Federal Efforts Are Being Undertaken to Address Harmful Algae
Published by the Government Accountability Office on 1999-06-30.
Below is a raw (and likely hideous) rendition of the original report. (PDF)