oversight

Congressional Inquiry, Withdrawal of Funds from HUD Grants, Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma

Published by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Inspector General on 1998-05-26.

Below is a raw (and likely hideous) rendition of the original report. (PDF)

                                                  U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
                                                  Southwest District Office of Inspector
                                                  General
                                                  1600 Throckmorton, Room 406
                                                  Post Office Box 2905
                                                  Fort Worth, Texas 76113-2905
                                                  (817)978-9309 FAX (817)978-9316
                                                   http://www.hud.gov/oig/oigindex.html




May 26, 1998                                      98-FW-259-1811

Memorandum For:              Mr. Wayne Sims, Administrator
                             Southern Plains Office of Native American Programs, 6IPI



From:          D. Michael Beard
               District Inspector General, 6AGA

Subject:       Congressional Inquiry
               Withdrawal of Funds from HUD Grants
               Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma

       In response to a request from Senators Don Nickles and Jim Inhofe and Representative
Tom Coburn, we reviewed the Cherokee Nation’s use of HUD grant funds. The members of
Congress requested we review expenditures for compliance with the intent of Congress and the
Administration. Accordingly, the review objective was to find out whether the Nation had
misused grant funds drawn down from HUD. We will provide a copy of this report to the
members of Congress and to the Cherokee Nation.

        To achieve the objective, we reviewed drawdowns from HUD and charges to grant
programs for the period October 1, 1996, through December 31, 1997. For the 15-month period,
we reconciled the Nation’s drawdown data to HUD’s records. We made a cursory review of all
drawdowns and expenses. We judgmentally selected major or curious items to review supporting
documentation in detail. The detailed review included $134,670 of the $1.2 million charged to
HUD programs. We reviewed grant agreements and applicable HUD regulations and cost
standards. The review included interviews of staff at HUD’s Office of Native American Programs
in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, and the Nation’s accounting and program staff in Tahlequah,
Oklahoma. In addition, we reviewed documents and talked to officials concerning an allegation
that the Nation renovated a house that was ineligible for a HUD grant program. We also looked
for ineligible lobbying payments during the period October 1, 1995 through December 31, 1997.
We conducted the audit in accordance with Government Auditing Standards.

       If you have any questions, please call Jerry R. Thompson, Assistant District Inspector
General for Audit.
                                              SUMMARY

         We found no evidence to indicate the Cherokee Nation had misused grant funds drawn
down from HUD. For HUD grants, program expenses exceeded drawdowns by more than
$230,000 as of December 31, 1997. The house Nation officials renovated was eligible for grant
funds. Also, we found no evidence that officials had used HUD funds to pay for lobbying
activities.

       The Nation had not fully implemented its American Fundware accounting system at the
time of our review. As a result, the new system could not produce a complete report of receipts
and expenses, financial management reports, or a reliable general ledger for fiscal periods since
September 30, 1996. This significantly impacts management’s ability to make financial decisions.
However, the Nation is taking steps to correct this problem. The Nation’s accounting staff
prepared a report of receipts and expenses for each HUD grant for our review by using data from
both the old and the new systems.


                                            BACKGROUND

        The Cherokee Nation is the second largest federally recognized Native American tribe in
the United States. It is located within the 14 counties of northeastern Oklahoma. The boundary
runs northerly and southeasterly from Tulsa, Oklahoma, to the Kansas and Arkansas state
borders. The Cherokee Nation’s jurisdictional area, which consists of 9,234 square miles and
includes all of nine counties and parts of five other counties, was established following the
historical boundaries of the Cherokee Nation after the Treaty of 1866.

        The Nation has a tripartite form of government. The Principal Chief has the executive
power and is responsible for the execution of tribal laws. The Legislative Branch consists of 15
tribal council members. The Council convenes monthly to propose and adopt legislation and to
conduct other business. The Judicial Branch consists of the Judicial Appeals Tribunal and the
Cherokee Nation District Court. The Tribunal hears and resolves disagreements arising under the
constitution or any Council enactment. The District Court hears all cases under the jurisdiction of
the Nation’s judicial code.

        The Nation’s existing automated financial accounting system has been the subject of
criticism in recent audit reports and in a report issued by an independent commission engaged by
the Tribal Council. The Nation bought a new financial accounting computer system to address
these concerns. During Fiscal Year 1997, staff partially implemented the new system but serious
problems resulted. The Nation has engaged Deloitte & Touche, LLP, to assist the Nation’s staff
in producing financial and management reports for Fiscal Year 1997, and to assist with the
implementation of the new accounting system.

        Special revenue funds account for funds from specific revenue sources. Composed
primarily of federal, state, and private grants and contracts, the Nation uses the funds to finance
specified activities as required by law or administrative regulations. For Fiscal Year 1996,


                                                2
revenues totaled $82,107,000. Expenditures totaled $82,463,000. As a result, the Nation had a
deficiency of revenues of $356,000 for the year. Of the total, the Housing and Urban
Development fund had revenues and expenditures of $1,160,000 and $1,188,000, respectively, a
$28,000 deficiency of revenues.

        During the 15-month period from October 1, 1996, through December 31, 1997, the
Nation had four grant programs funded by HUD: Congregate Housing Services, Emergency
Shelter, Community Development Block Grant, and HOME. The Nation drew down $948,846 in
grant funds and charged over $1.2 million in expense to these programs during this period.

       The last single audit report on the Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma covered the fiscal year
ended September 30, 1996. By memorandum dated December 4, 1997, the Office of Inspector
General of the Department of Interior advised HUD that it had reviewed the report, the report
meets applicable requirements, and it does not contain any findings related to direct funding
provided by HUD. Deloitte & Touche, LLP, Certified Public Accountants, did the audit.


                                      RESULTS OF REVIEW

        We did not find any indications that Nation officials had misused HUD funds, although
staff had made mistakes in calculating drawdown amounts and applying receipts and expenses to
programs. Also, we did not find any validity to the allegation that a house renovated by the
Nation was ineligible. Although the accounting system was not capable of providing timely and
accurate financial information, the Nation is taking steps to correct the problem.

Cherokee Nation had not misused HUD funds.

       For the 15 month period, we reviewed drawdowns of grant funds and expenses charged to
the Nation’s Congregate Housing Services, Emergency Shelter, Community Development Block
Grant, and HOME programs. During the audit period the Nation drew $948,846 from and
charged $1,230,916 to programs as shown below:

             PROGRAM                            RECEIPTS        EXPENSE
             Congregate Housing Services          $ 80,418      $ 123,526
             Emergency Shelter                     107,725         104,463
             CDBG Program                          453,107         535,062
             HOME Program                          307,596         467,865
             Total                                $948,846      $1,230,916

        In reviewing receipts we noted that two drawdown calculations for Congregate Housing
Services funds were incorrect. This occurred because accounting staff mistakenly used the wrong
amounts and had not adjusted a drawdown request for an amount that staff had previously
requested but not received. As a result, the Nation received two amounts that staff could not
justify at the time of the withdrawal. These mistakes amounted to $12,249 in January 1997 and
$9,761 in May 1997. However, later draw downs have corrected the mistakes. From the


                                              3
inception of each of the grants to December 31, 1997, total expense charged to HUD grants
exceeded total grant receipts by $230,000.

        We also noted accounting staff mistakenly recorded a receipt from a Congregate Housing
Services grant as a Community Development Block Grant receipt. As a result, Nation’s records
for revenues from the programs were over and understated $13,680.61, which is a classification
error that does not change the total receipts from HUD grants. We told officials about the error.

       In reviewing expenses we noted where staff mistakenly charged an instructor fee to the
Emergency Shelter Program. This occurred because program staff had used the wrong cost code.
As a result, staff caused emergency shelter expense to be overstated $990. Accounting has since
corrected the error.

Allegations of the Nation inappropriately remodeling a house are invalid.

        An area newspaper reported questions about the legality of remodeling a non-Indian’s
house. Reportedly, the Nation’s community development program spent more than $22,500 in
HUD funds to remodel the home of the mother of a tribal councilor. The tribal councilor’s father
was a registered Cherokee but passed away during the first week of January 1998, before work
on the house started on January 10, 1998.

        After reviewing the file on the questioned house renovation and talking to the Director of
the Community Development Department, we concluded that the renovation complies with HUD
requirements. The renovation is not excessive, was approved before the tribal councilor became a
councilor, and, if the father of the councilor had lived, the cost of renovation apparently would
not be a matter of discussion. Because he died before the contractor started work and his family
did not report his death until after construction started, some people have questioned why officials
let the contractor finish the work. Government regulations do not limit renovation assistance to
persons of registered Indian heritage nor do Community Development Department policies cover
the situation when a death occurs before an approved renovation is completed. Therefore,
officials did not violate requirements.

Accounting System was not capable of producing timely and accurate financial information.

        Nation officials knew the new American Fundware accounting system did not work as it
should. In 1994, the Council hired a firm to implement the accounting system. Implementation
started in 1996. However, after 2 years and paying the firm about $100,000, the system still had
problems. The payroll system had numerous errors. These errors caused unreliable payroll data
and errors in Federal W-2 forms, state unemployment, and travel reimbursement reports. Officials
also had not closed the old accounting system and put remaining account balances into the new
system. Without the transfer of balances the new system could not produce complete reports of
receipts and expenses or other financial management reports. The lack of such reports hinders
management’s ability to make financial management decisions.




                                                 4
        The Council approached American Fundware about completing implementation, but their
price exceeded what the Council would pay at the time. On January 26, 1998, the Council
authorized funding of $2 million to resolve the Nation’s accounting system problems and close
out the books for Fiscal Year 1997. On February 10, 1998, the Council engaged Deloitte &
Touche, LLP, to assist the Nation’s staff in reconciling and closing its financial records for Fiscal
Year 1997, and to provide project coordination, management, and technical support in making the
accounting system functional.


                                     MANAGEMENT CONTROLS

       In planning and performing our audit, we considered management control systems of the
Cherokee Nation to determine our auditing procedures and not to provide assurance on
management controls. Management controls include the plan of organization, methods, and
procedures adopted by management to ensure that its goals are met. Management controls
include the processes for planning, organizing, directing, and controlling program operations.
They include the systems for measuring, reporting, and monitoring program performance.

       We concluded the following management control categories are relevant to our objectives:

       Validity and reliability of data
       Compliance with laws and regulations

        We obtained an understanding of management controls through inquires of accounting and
program staffs. We also reviewed the Nation’s organization chart and its policies and procedures
for use of federal fund resources.

        Since the Nation had not accomplished closeout of its financial records for Fiscal Year
1997, and financial reporting as required, we believe the incomplete implementation of the
Nation’s accounting system is a significant weakness in the Nation’s Management Controls. As
indicated in the Results of Review section of this report, the Nation has taken steps to correct this
weakness in management controls.




                                                 5
                                      DISTRIBUTION


Secretary's Representative, 6AS
State Coordinator
Director, CPD, 6AD
Comptroller, 6AF
Director, Accounting, 6AAF
Wayne Sims, 6IPI (4)
Saul N. Ramirez, Jr., Acting Deputy Secretary, SD (Room 10100)
Hal C. DeCell III, A/S for Congressional and Intergovernmental Relations, J (Room 10120)
Karen Hinton, A/S for Public Affairs, W (Room 10132)
Jon Cowan, Chief of Staff, S (Room 10000)
Jacquie Lawing, Deputy Chief of Staff for Programs & Policy, S (Room 10226)
Robert Hickmott, Counselor to the Secretary, S (Room 10234)
Patricia Enright, Sr Advisor to the Secretary for Communication Policy, S (Room 10222)
Gail W. Laster, General Counsel, C (Room 10214)
Saul N. Ramirez, Jr., Assistant Secretary for CPD, D (Room 7100)
Willie Gilmore, Acting Assistant Secretary for Administration, A (Room 10110)
David Gibbons, Director, Office of Budget, ARB (Room 3270)
Art Agnos, Acting Assistant Secretary for Housing, H (Room 9100)
Deborah Vincent, Acting General A/S for Public & Indian Housing, P (Room 4100)
Assistant to the Deputy Secretary for Field Management, SDF (Room 7106)
Assistant to the Secretary for Labor Relations (Acting), SL (Room 7118)
CPD/ALO, DG (Room 7214) (3)
Acquisitions Librarian, Library, AS (Room 8141)
Chief Financial Officer, F (Room 10164) (2)
Deputy Chief Financial Officer for Operations, FF (Room 10166) (2)
Director, Housing & Community Dev. Issue Area, US GAO,
 441 G St. NW, (Room 2474), Washington, DC 20548
 Attn: Judy England-Joseph (2)
Mr. Pete Sessions, Govt Reform & Oversight Comm., U.S. Congress,
 House of Rep., Washington, D.C. 20515-4305
The Honorable Fred Thompson, Chairman, Comm. on Govt Affairs,
 U.S. Senate, Washington, D.C. 20510-6250
The Honorable John Glenn, Ranking Member, Comm. on Govt Affairs,
        U.S. Senate, Washington, D.C. 20510-6250
Cindy Sprunger, Subcomm. on Gen. Oversight & Invest., Room 212,
        O'Neill House Ofc. Bldg., Washington, D.C. 20515
Inspector General
Cherokee Nation




                                              6