<@- . z NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL OFFICE OF INVESTIGATIONS 4 o \O CLOSEOUT MEMORANDUM ON D AT Case Number: A-06090043 Page 1 of 1 We received an allegation from the complainant1 that the NSF proposal submitted by subjects 1, 2, and 3,2 contained some material that was taken (intellectual theft) from one of the complainant's earlier NSF proposals.3 It was alleged that the objectives, goals, and methodology presented in the subjects' proposal were very similar to those presented in the complainant's proposal. Further, the complainant alleged that the dataset to be used by the subjects as presented in the NSF proposal was taken from another scientist without permission. Our review showed that there were actually two scientists working together and developing the dataset. The two scientists had received, jointly, funding to develop a field laboratory that would generate data of a very specific n a t ~ r e .Further, ~ the subjects' proposal clearly indicated their working relationship with one of the two scientists. The complainant was unaware that the original funded project was jointly sponsoring the two scientists. As such, each scientist could develop, independently, additional working relationships with others to continue the data taking process and modeling of results. Finally, because each proposal with each scientist planned to utilize the existing field laboratory, each had similar objectives, goals, and methodologies, with very different modeling plans. We concluded that there was no substance to either allegation. This case is closed and no further action will be taken. . . NSF OIG Fo~m2 (1 1/02)
Published by the National Science Foundation, Office of Inspector General on 2007-01-05.
Below is a raw (and likely hideous) rendition of the original report. (PDF)