Peer Review violation

Published by the National Science Foundation, Office of Inspector General on 2017-07-14.

Below is a raw (and likely hideous) rendition of the original report. (PDF)

                                                    NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
                                                     OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL
                                                       OFFICE OF INVESTIGATIONS

                                              CLOSEOUT MEMORANDUM

 Case Number: I-17-0065-O                                                                    Page 1 of 1

                We received an allegation that an NSF panel reviewer 1 provided a copy of a proposal he
         reviewed, that was awarded, 2 to a colleague, 3 in violation of NSF’s policies regarding reviewer

                The Subject acknowledged he shared the proposal with his colleague, but said he did so
         because he incorrectly thought that, if awarded, proposals automatically became publically
         available. He also said he kept a copy of the proposal because he was unaware that was not
         allowed. He apologized and said he destroyed this and other proposals he retained.

                We generated a questionable research practice letter to the Subject, reminding him to
         maintain reviewer confidentiality.

                   Accordingly, this case is closed with no further action taken.



NSF OIG Form 2 (11/02)