Memorandum
-
To: ~ File
19$0900%
From: 8
w
-
Through:
Special
Subject:
alleged that Dr. while supervising D ~ . S grant, F required
feesn or "analytical costs," even though
no 'analysis" was done. alleged that Dr. was purchasing
materials from he then used to create
P i n
this work, Dr.h e n sold the ac t for a profit.
Il
I1
-
a dispute
about the ownership
was a disgruntled former to sabotage Dr.
research, and who was
We examined Dr
1 as those of
NSF grants as well examined account
for these gran(s Dr. -Dr.
were interviewed. In addition, I
11
I
We did not identify any charges
- -
for abstract fees or analytical costs (or anything- analogous to
we did not identify any transactions with
grants. accounting personnel examined
there were no analytical costs
s NSF grant, and that there had iibeen no transactions of any kind wit
in the grants. 1
Based on the lack of evidence in support of d r . m allegations, this case is closed.
Grant Fraud
Published by the National Science Foundation, Office of Inspector General on 1998-03-09.
Below is a raw (and likely hideous) rendition of the original report. (PDF)